A recent Nebraska Court of Appeals decision shows why financial records matter in divorce. In Bennett v. Bennett, the court addressed how personal injury settlement proceeds, commingled funds, valuation dates, and income tax debt may be handled as part of Nebraska property division. The key takeaway is not that every case will be treated the same, but that classification and tracing matter. If settlement funds, tax debts, separate accounts, or marital debt are part of your divorce, it is important to understand what documents may help the court determine what is marital, what may be nonmarital, and what can actually be proven.

Appealing a Nebraska divorce decree does not automatically pause payment obligations. Based on the Nebraska Court of Appeals’ memorandum opinion in McReynolds v. McReynolds, this article explains why equalization payments, attorney-fee awards, and other financial obligations may remain enforceable during an appeal unless proper supersedeas or stay procedures are followed. It also discusses how Nebraska courts may evaluate “inability to pay,” why valuable non-cash assets can matter, and what steps a person should consider before missing a court-ordered divorce payment deadline.

Divorce cases are rarely decided by who tells the better story. In Pebley v. Pebley (2026), the Nebraska Court of Appeals made that clear—showing how custody decisions, premarital property claims, and large equalization payments actually rise or fall in real cases. This article breaks down what the court did, why it mattered, and what Nebraska parents and spouses need to understand before walking into court.

In Klahn v. Klahn (2025), the Nebraska Court of Appeals clarified when judges can modify parenting time and child support—and when they can’t. The case explains limits on redefining parenting plans, reducing daily phone calls, and choosing the correct child support worksheet.